02:06:00
ONIN-068 tstatreg
Speaker: Access to government buildings and services should be limited to citizens. Non-citizens and undocumented immigrants should not be allowed to use these facilities.
Speaker: This would decrease the time spent in line and burden on public resources. Limiting these spaces would work in the interest of the people.
Speaker: The government should hold to the government function to protect tax money we need to cut their access to public services only Citizens deserve to be able to use their country tools and its offerings.
Speaker: Citizens should be citizens access different public too from citizens. As citizens they hold a different order of control, only face benefit is for citizens.
Speaker: Most tax payers should live here and should be paying taxes to help the community is focused on getting back and help the large most of the citizens are correct to have access.
I disagree with Speaker's argument that access to government buildings and services should be limited to citizens. This idea would lead to unfair discrimination and violate basic rights for all societies. The restriction would contradict the principle of equality and fairness. Humans are all born; discrimination could have adverse effects should be surpassed because that might cause serious problems in multiple ways.
Currently, diversity among people is a good thing, and the speaker suggested that the premises banning access for non-citizens should be swayed away. Diversity is necessary within society, promoting peace and human rights. The speaker's stance deteriorates these qualities. The suggested idea cannot be sustained as it contradicts the known popular rights of equality and fairness. The consequences would be controversial and would not support the core of the discussions in this Forum. Every human being should be equal and deserves to use the necessary services they need. Restricting access for non-citizens would only be an imbalance in justice and could work against the shared atmosphere.
The idea is unreasonable, and so is the action of discrimination based on citizenship. Furthermore, it could have serious problems by excluding people based on citizenship. This would lead to some societal loss and would not be in the best interests varying towards all people. The change would negatively affect the diversity among people, as this would hinder the core of fairness and equality, derived from many essential sources of building society. Even a single idea has to be focused on these qualities to maintain a balance. The implications of this suggestion would not do that. Additionally, the government in any country should act with responsibilities in mind. The position would directly go against the idea of being a government. Therefore, the argument presented by the speaker is undesirable and should be rejected.
10月16日2021年
English
中文
日本語
Bahasa Indo
