GOLD-01 But 2nd-place China, with a population that is about 5 times bigger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to have the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When 1st-place America, with a population that is about 5 times smaller than China's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But 2nd-place China, with a population that is about 5 times bigger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When first-place America, with a population that is about 5 times smaller than China's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But second-place China, with a population that is about 5 times larger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to have the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When first-place America, with a population that is about 5 times smaller than China's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But second-place China, with a population that is about 5 times larger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to have the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When rock-fling China, with a population that is about 5 times bigger than America's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But rock-fling China, with a population that is about 5 times bigger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to have the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When first-place America, with a population that is about 5 times smaller than China's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But second-place China, with a population that is about 5 times larger than America's, won 88 medals. So China had to win 5 times more medals to have the same number as America. So, [1 / (1/5)] = 5/1 = 1. That is lower than America's. So China does not have better per capita than America. When first-place America, with a population that is about 5 times smaller than China's, won 88 medals, the medal count was still higher per capita. But second-place China, with a population that is about 5 times larger than America's, won 8
27 Mei 2009